Most SEO advice is a list of tactics with no account of which matter or why. Ranking is better understood as three sequential problems, and work on the later ones is wasted until the earlier ones are solved.
The three problems, in order
- Can Google find and read the page? Crawling and indexing. If the answer is no, nothing else matters at all.
- Does the page answer the query better than what already ranks? Relevance and quality. This is where most effort should go and rarely does.
- Does Google trust the site enough to rank it? Authority, largely from other sites linking to yours. The slowest to change and the hardest to influence honestly.
A technically perfect page answering nothing ranks nowhere. An excellent page on a site with no authority ranks on page five. Diagnose which problem you have before choosing a fix.
Indexing: the part that is genuinely checkable
Use Search Console’s URL Inspection on a specific page rather than guessing. It reports whether the page is indexed, when it was last crawled, and why it was excluded. “Discovered but not indexed” and “URL is unknown to Google” mean quite different things: the first means Google saw the link and chose not to fetch it, the second that it never saw it at all.
New sites commonly sit in the second state for weeks. Internal links from pages Google already crawls, and a submitted sitemap, are what resolve it. Submitting the same URL repeatedly does not.
Relevance: match intent, not keywords
Search the query you want to rank for and look at what actually ranks. If the results are all comparison tables and yours is an essay, the format is wrong regardless of quality. Google has already told you what it thinks the query means; the top ten results are that answer.
Specific queries are winnable in a way broad ones are not. A new site will not rank for “laptops” and can rank for a precise question that few pages answer well. Depth on a narrow topic beats coverage of a wide one.
Authority: the honest version
Links from other sites remain a major ranking factor, and there is no reliable trick to obtaining them. What works is producing something worth citing and then telling relevant people it exists. Buying links violates Google’s guidelines and risks manual action.
This is usually the real constraint. A site with few referring domains can be technically flawless and still rank at position 50, and no amount of on-page work moves it. Recognising that saves months spent re-optimising titles.
What is not worth your time
Keyword density targets, meta keywords, submitting to directories, and rewriting titles repeatedly on pages that rank at position 60 — at that position almost nobody sees the title to click it.
Common questions
How long does SEO take? Months, and longer on a new domain. Anyone promising weeks is describing something else.
Does publishing more help? Only if each piece is genuinely good. Volume of thin content actively hurts.
Do I need to blog? Only if search demand exists for what you would write. Publishing without checking is the most common wasted effort.
Why did traffic drop after a Google update? Usually relative rather than absolute: competitors were reassessed upward. Check whether rankings fell or the results page itself changed shape.
Join the discussion